|
|
About once a month, Dave
Kopel produces a free e-mail Newsletter containing short
summaries and links to important new research and writing
involving the Second Amendment and firearms policy. The
newsletter also reports on Kopel's latest writing.
The content of this newsletter is produced by the Second Amendment Project at the Independence Institute, a think tank in Golden, Colorado. The newsletter is electronically distributed by the Second Amendment Foundation in Bellevue, Washington. Thus, the Second Amendment Foundation will be given your e-mail address. Archive
of past issues. Second Amendment Project Newsletter. September 14, 2001. The Second Amendment Project is based at the Independence Institute, a free-market think tank in Golden, Colorado.
Ronald Reagan, Speech to the National Association of Evangelicals, March 8, 1983.
============================= Special note from Dave Kopel:
As President Bush leads our nation in the beginning days of a war which will continue for years before final victory, many Americans are wondering exactly who our enemy is. The real enemy is the same one that we fought when we in the hot war against Nazi Germany and in the cold war against Soviet Communism. It is the same enemy that mankind has been fighting for many centuries. Evil may wear different faces, and totalitarianism may find different pretexts, but in the end, the goal is always the same: to crush forever man’s sacred capacity for reason, to extinguish the human spirit. The enemy’s vision is that that of Big Brother in George Orwell’s novel 1984: “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stomping on human face... FOREVER.”
In the early 1980s, most people thought the Soviet Union would endure for many more decades, perhaps forever. But President Reagan understood the fundamental weakness of a society founded on the supremacy of the state over the individual and the family. In 1981,he called Communism “a sad, bizarre chapter in human history whose last pages are even now being written."
In 1983, he described the USSR as “a society where productive forces are hampered by political ones. It is the Soviet Union that runs against the tide of history by denying freedom and human dignity to its citizens. The march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history."
So too will bin Laden and the Taliban and their allies lie in the ash-heap of history. Just as World War II led to the liberation of the Japanese people from military dictatorship, the new war will liberate much of the world from a dictatorial dark age.
As we destroy the enemies of freedom, we must take care not to allow them the victory of destroying our own freedom. They hate us precisely because we are free, because we show the world that freedom works, that man can govern himself. Political opportunists in America are already trying to use the war as a pretext for hustling Americans into surrendering the rights which were won at such great cost at places like Lexington and Saratoga, and defended with so much blood at New Orleans, Normandy, Midway, Inchon and thousands of other battlefields.
The casualties from the first day of bin Laden’s war appear to be nearly as large, and perhaps much larger than, total American civilian casualties during World War II. They will not be the last casualties – although there be fewer casualties in the long run because we are fighting now, rather than allowing the forces of darkness to grow stronger.
We must ensure that our sacred, inalienable rights – endowed by our Creator and guaranteed by our Constitution – never become casualties in this war. Our rights are not obstacles to our success in this war; they are the very reason we are fighting. It our duty to ensure that the rights we pass to the next generations of America emerge from this war better protected than ever, rather than sacrificed to panic.
Already, a concerted assault on the Fourth Amendment and privacy has begun. A massive expansion of government surveillance – including authorization for the government to trace a person’s web browsing without a warrant – passed the Senate 98-0 with no time for reflection of debate. If it is important to you that Congress and the President protect the Constitution, your elected officials need to hear from you very soon.
You can be sure that before the war is over, there will be similar assaults on the Second Amendment. Now more than ever it is important to defend and exercise your Second Amendment rights.
Even more so than in World War II, the American heartland is at risk of enemy attack. As I detail in the first article in this newsletter, armed American citizens could have saved thousands of lives on Tuesday. The next time that terrorists attempt to strike inside our borders, they must be instantly destroyed by armed American citizens. Not since the Second was ratified in 1791 has the right to keep and bear arms been so important to our national defense.
In 1941-42, armed Americans assisted in guarding the coasts of Hawaii, Virginia, and Maryland. Today, every American state is a potential target, and we know that our enemy’s offensive operations will take place primarily in the United States. Be prepared.
Be prepared too to use your First Amendment rights and other political rights to defend the Second Amendment against all who would use the war as a pretext to infringe and eventually destroy it.
The first section of this newsletter deals with the war which began Tuesday. Other sections of this newsletter, which were created before Tuesday, address more mundane Second Amendment issues.
============================= Table of Contents for this issue
1. The War – and the importance of armed civilians and civil liberties. 2. Recent Kopel articles on other gun issues. 3. The National Academy of Sciences commences it gun control study. 4. Links 5. The rest of the Star-Spangled Banner.
============================= 1. The War
“It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace—but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!. . . Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775. http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/henry-liberty.html
Making the Air Safe for Terror: By Dave Kopel & Captain David Petteys, retired United Airlines pilot, Marine helicopter pilot in the Vietnam War, National Review Online Sunday, Sept. 16, 2001 http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel091401.shtml
What Now? The ultimate test. By Dave Kopel National Review Online Sept. 12, 2001 http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel091201.shtml
Don't Sacrifice Freedom Glenn Harlan Reynolds Fox News Channel September 14, 2001 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34300,00.html
Wired Magazine The best source for up-to-date information about fast-moving Congressional legislation aimed at electronic privacy.
============================= 2. Recent Kopel articles on other gun issues
Jamaica Farewell. The consequences of gun prohibition. National Review Online. Sept. 10, 2001. With Paul Gallant and Joanne Eisen. http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel091001.shtml
Protecting Makers of Weapons Boosts Democracy, Rights. Analysis of California Supreme Court decision, Merrill v. Navegar. Los Angeles Daily Journal, page 6, and the San Francisco Daily Journal. Aug. 30, 2001. http://www.i2i.org/SuptDocs/Crime/
============================= 3. National Academy of Sciences study
Political Science: Doing science a grave
injustice. National Review Online. Aug. 29, 2001. http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel082901.shtml
Gun Panel Hears With an Ear Shut By John Lott
Los Angeles Times la-000070556aug31.story?coll=la%2Dnews%2
Dcomment%2Dopinions http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,33361,00.html
Shots in the Dark August 31, 2001 By Sam MacDonald Reason Online http://www.reason.com/hod/sm083101.html
============================= 4. Links
A. Sports
Survey of the favorite Olympic sports, and sweepstakes entry form. Shooting is listed.
B. Women
AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape and Endangerment) has a new, expanded web site, including:
1. Two test-yourself quizzes, one on general
self-defense, one Women & Guns magazine
La liberté des armes au féminin Run by Claire Joly, this is the first French website for women interested in the right to keep and bear arms. The site also has a number of articles in English.
Hosted at the Subversive Liberty website.
Guns in wrong hands are a problem;
guns in
right hands aren't and am half out the door when I realize - dang - forgot my pistol. http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ kathleenparker/kp20010902.shtml
C. History
Breaking information on the Michael Bellesiles hoax book, “Arming America.”
Disarming America
By Melissa Seckora, National Review
editorial associate Seckora finds that the San Francisco probate records which Bellesiles claims to have examined were actually destroyed in the 1906 earthquake. http://www.nationalreview.com/01oct01/seckora100101.shtml
“New doubts about gun historian: By David Mehegan Boston Globe, 9/11/2001. The Boston Globe checks the Vermont and Rhode Island probate records
that Bellesiles used, and finds that he
grossly misrepresented them.
New research by Clayton Cramer, further
exposing the Bellesiles hoax. http://www.claytoncramer.com/primary.html#MilitiaStatutes
Gun Control in Colonial New England" unControlColonialNewEngland.PDF
GunControlColonialNewEngland2.PDF
MiddleSouthernColonialGunControl.PDF
The John Brown case, Timothy McVeigh, and
Waco.
D. Politics Polish your jackboots, Reno's running Don Feder September 12, 2001 http://www.townhall.com/columnists/
Rambo Reno makes laughable run for governor Kathleen Parker September 12, 2001 http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ kathleenparker/kp20010912.shtml
E. International
Gun crime in London is increasing so rapidly that police fear they may not have the resources to cope, the BBC has learned. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/
newsid_1471000/1471716.stm
http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Story/20010824-006/page.asp F. Research
New study touts gun registration and licensing. Center for Gun Policy and Research at the Johns Hopkins University,
http://www.jhsph.edu/pubaffairs/press/gun_laws.html Study examines gun laws and crimeAugust 31, 2001 By David Williams Cnn.com Article discussing above story. Includes quote from Kopel http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/08/30/gun.study/index.html
Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse Karen Callaghan; Frauke Schnell Political Communication, volume 18, issue no. 2 (2001), pp. 183-213. Analyzes network news media framing of the Brady Bill and the “Assault Weapons” Ban, from 1988 to 1996. Concludes that the media consistently framed the issues in a “culture of violence” theme. Available at academic libraries, or can be purchased on-line for $21, at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/default.html
Emory University study shows that people who dislike the NRA the most have the least accurate understanding of it. http://www.jointogether.org/gv/default.jtml?O=545524
Ten Essential Observations on Guns in America Published in the mid-1990s, but still very relevant. http://www.jax-inter.net/~caryb/afc.html
G. Schools
Our Killing Schools Claremont Institute C. Bradley Thompson, Ashland University. Lengthy monograph traces school shootings to the moral nihilism taught in government schools. http://www.claremont.org/apsa/apsa01thompson.cfm
Clayton Cramer The Canaries are Dying
The culture of depravity that sets the stage
for school shootings.
Schools and Suspensions: Justice Policy Institute. Argues that zero tolerance policies are too severe. http://www.cjcj.org/sss/sss.html
H. Legal News
Second Circuit Hamilton v. Accu-Tek. No. 997753v2 - 08/31/01 Second Circuit unanimously dismisses the grand-daddy of the anti-gun lawsuits. The District Court’s finding of partial liability by gun companies is reversed in its entirety. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ getcase.plcourt=2nd&navby=case&no=997753v2&exact=1
Fifth Circuit. US v. Fix No. 00-10789, August 29, 2001
Three-judge panel unanimously rules that
defendant cannot be prosecuted under the federal felon in possession
statute because since his rights were previously restored.
Three-judge panel unanimously rules that the
federal machine gun ban Relying on Lewis v US, the court describes the Second Amendment having nothing to do with individual rights. The defendant went to the police, told that he had unregistered machine guns, and that the police could not make him register. US v. Haney, No 00-6129 (10th Cir. August 29, 2001)
http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/10th/006129.html
Is Federal Court Logjam On The Way?
Aug. 30, 2001 Concerns about a major increase in federal gun prosecutions. http://www.lexisone.com/news/nlibrary/n083101z.html
I. Self-Defense
Operation Self Defense
New website collects comprehensive reports of
self-defense incidents.
============================== The rest of the Star Spangled Banner
We all know the first verse of the Star Spangled Banner. Most of us know that it comes from a poem, The Defense of Fort McHenry, written by Francis Scott Key as he watched the British shell Fort McHenry, during the War of 1812. The first verse ends with the question, “O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave, O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?”
The second verse answers the question, as Key sees the flag still flying during battle:
The third and fourth verses, though, are the ones with which I would like to leave you, for the tell us how bin Laden’s war will end, and they point us to our duty:
That's all folks! |
