March 01, 2004, 9:26 a.m., National Review
OnlineThe Return of a Legislative Legend
Debating "cop-killers"
As the Senate considers legislation to
prohibit abusive lawsuits against Second Amendment rights, Sen. Ted
Kennedy is offering an amendment to ban ammunition. Kennedy claims
that he is aiming at "cop-killer" bullets, but he appears to be
badly misinformed on the issue.
There never has been any such thing as a "cop-killer" bullet. The
issue is a fiction, invented for purposes of politics, not public
safety. In any case, since 1986, federal law has prohibited the rare
types of handgun ammunition that have unusual abilities to penetrate
body armor.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives reports
that current ammunition laws are fully sufficient to protect the
police, and that attempts to change these laws could actually lead
to increased police fatalities. Notwithstanding this strong warning,
some lobbyists and politicians continue to play on public
misunderstanding, by using the so-called "cop-killer" issue to
demand the power to ban standard rifle ammunition used for hunting.
POLITICAL ORIGINS
The story of the nonexistent "cop-killer" bullet actually begins in
1976 in Massachusetts, when a handgun-confiscation initiative was
defeated in a landslide. Then, in 1982 in California, a
handgun-"freeze" initiative also lost overwhelmingly. The
gun-prohibition lobbies began to realize that they would have to
work more incrementally, rather than pushing for prohibition
outright.
The prohibition lobbies also realized that the police were one of
their worst problems. While a few police chiefs or sheriffs could
always be found to support prohibition, the vast majority of police
— both commanders and line officers — were "pro-gun," and extremely
skeptical of gun control. Something had to be done to turn the
police (or at least their Washington lobbyists) against the National
Rifle Association.
The something, ironically, was an obscure type of ammunition
invented by police officers two decades before. These bullets were
known as KTW bullets, after the initials of the three persons who
invented them for use in SWAT teams: Dr. Paul Kopsch and two police
officers named Turcus and Ward.
While ordinary bullets have a lead core, the KTW bullets used
brass or iron. The KTW bullet has a conical shape, and was
especially designed for shooting through glass or a car door. Of
course neither the KTW bullet nor any other bullet was invented for
the purpose of killing police officers.
KTW bullets have not been available for sale to the general
public since the 1960s.
TEFLON BULLETS?
"Cop-killer" bullets are sometimes called "Teflon bullets," but this
name reflects a serious misunderstanding. For example, in the movie
Lethal Weapon 3, a so-called "Teflon bullet" from a
medium-power handgun was supposedly able to penetrate several inches
of hardened steel on a bulldozer blade. In the real world, however,
no bullet could possibly perform such a stunt.
Actually, a Teflon coating is applied to the outside of a wide
variety of ordinary ammunition. Teflon reduces the lead abrasion
caused by the bullet's movement down the barrel of the gun. Thus,
the barrel is kept cleaner, and is protected from excessive wear.
Also, reduced abrasion means that fewer tiny lead air particles are
produced, so the air is cleaner — an especially important
consideration at indoor shooting ranges.
In addition, a Teflon coating on a bullet also makes the bullet
safer to use in a self-defense context. The Teflon helps the bullet
"grab" a hard surface such as glass or metal, and thus significantly
reduces the risk of a dangerous ricochet. Similarly, canes or
walking sticks are often coated with Teflon, so that they will not
slip on hard, smooth surfaces.
So in order to reduce ricochets, KTW bullets as well as many
ordinary types of defensive ammunition use Teflon or similar
substances.
BODY ARMOR
As police officers know, the vests that they wear are
"bullet-resistant," not "bullet-proof." The Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives explains that "armor protection is
rated in accordance with a specific threat. There is no such thing
as 'bullet-proof' armor."
Manufactured from Kevlar (a synthetic fiber that is five times
stronger than steel), body armor comes in a variety of grades. The
higher the grade, the bulkier and less comfortable the armor is to
wear, but the more ammunition it can stop. The highest grades of
armor are often called "tactical armor" or "hard armor," and may
contain steel or titanium.
At the top of the scale is Threat Level IV armor, which can stop
even a high-powered rifle bullet. It takes a very strong vest to
stop a big-game hunting-rifle bullet: The bullet travels at a high
velocity, due to the long length of the rifle barrel; and has a
large mass, since a hunting-rifle bullet must be large enough to
bring down a moose, elk, or other large mammal.
Almost the only people who wear hard armor are SWAT team members
on high-risk missions. Far more common for ordinary police use is
"soft" body armor, made from Kevlar, and rated at Threat Levels IIA
through IIIA. Level IIA armor can stop most handgun ammunition,
while Level IIIA can stop almost any handgun bullet. Handgun
ammunition is much easier to stop than rifle ammunition, since the
handgun barrel is much shorter (less velocity) and handgun bullets
are smaller (less mass).
POLICE OFFICER SAFETY
Even before the 1986 law restricting "armor-piercing ammunition,"
there had never been a case of a police officer killed with such
ammunition penetrating a vest. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms studied every police-officer shooting in the years 1985-94
and reported: "No law enforcement officer in the United States has
died as a result of a round of armor piercing ammunition, as
defined, having been fired from a handgun, subsequently penetrating
an officer's protective body armor causing lethal injuries."
Indeed, the BATF concluded that in the period studied, there had
not been any instances of officers being killed by any
type of handgun ammunition penetrating body armor.
Unfortunately, some public officials have made misleading claims
about officer safety. For example, in 1995 President Clinton
announced his support for a massive new ban on many ordinary types
of ammunition. In the speech, President Clinton spoke emotionally
about a Chicago police officer who had been fatally shot because a
"cop-killer" bullet penetrated his vest. There was only one problem
with the story: It wasn't true. The officer was shot by a criminal
who used ordinary ammunition. One shot hit the officer in the head.
Another shot went through an opening in the vest. No shot
penetrated the vest.
CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION
Although the "cop-killer"-bullet issue had no factual substance, it
was politically potent. As with so many other terms invented by
gun-prohibition lobbyists, the very name served to bias the debate
in favor of prohibition. The national media showed little interest
in reporting facts such as the origin of the KTW bullet, or that the
KTW was not for sale to the public, or that no police officer had
ever been shot at or killed with such a bullet, or that Teflon
didn't make bullets more powerful.
Once the bait was set, the switch was made. New York Democratic
Rep. Mario Biaggi (who would later leave Congress due to felony
convictions involving extensive personal corruption) introduced a
bill to outlaw all ammunition capable of penetrating soft body armor
if fired from a handgun with a six-inch barrel. This could lead to a
ban on most rifle ammunition, since most rifle ammunition will
penetrate soft body armor, and many common types of rifle ammunition
fit some handguns. Soft body armor is designed to stop handgun
ammunition, not rifle ammunition.
When this fact was pointed out, media figures sneered that gun
owners wanted to go deer-hunting with cop-killer Teflon bullets — as
if deer were wearing body armor.
As the debated continued, the constant repetition of the phrase
"cop-killer bullet" helped drive a wedge between Second Amendment
groups and many police officers. The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP)
— the largest rank-and-file police group in the U.S. — had been an
enthusiastic supporter of the McClure-Volkmer Firearms Owners'
Protection Act (FOPA), a bill to reform abusive enforcement of the
1968 Gun Control Act.
But after the "cop-killer" controversy, the police group's
director switched sides, and announced that FOPA was a grave threat
to the lives of police officers. FOPA itself had nothing to do with
KTW or Teflon ammunition, but the FOP director's broader point was
his anger over the "cop-killer bullet" issue.
Many of the friends of the Second Amendment in Congress and the
Reagan White House quietly insisted that something be done to get
rid of the controversy.
THE FEDERAL BAN
Accordingly, the National Rifle Association and Representative
Biaggi reached a compromise: Instead of a penetration standard
(which would ban most rifle ammunition), a content standard was
adopted. The sale or import of handgun ammunition with a significant
amount of steel, titanium, or other metal core was outlawed. (The
relevant federal regulation specifies that: "armor piercing
ammunition" is a handgun bullet "constructed entirely" from "
tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or
depleted uranium," or with certain kinds of jackets on the bullet.)
An important new protection in the compromise bill required that
"armor-piercing ammunition" be so labeled. This prevented people
from being prosecuted for the unwitting sale of the newly restricted
ammunition. For example, some surplus ammunition imported from
Czechoslovakia contained a solid core, rather than a lead core,
because there had been a lead shortage in the Czechoslovakia when
the ammunition was manufactured.
Biaggi pronounced that the compromise achieved everything he had
wanted from the original bill. The NRA spread the word that the vote
for the compromise would not be scored as a "wrong" vote.
Severe mandatory prison sentences were enacted for use of
federally defined "armor-piercing ammunition" in a violent or
drug-trafficking crime. The rarity of the actual misuse of such
unusual ammunition is demonstrated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms study of firearms crime in 1985-94, which found that
there had only been four prosecutions for use of the ammunition in a
crime.
BANNING HUNTING AMMUNITION?
The 1997 BATFE report on the threat to police officers from criminal
use of ammunition concluded: "Because the existing laws are working,
no additional legislation regarding such laws is necessary. In this
matter, to err on the conservative side of the existing status quo
laws is to avoid any experimentation with police officer lives that
could conceivably lead to numerous additional officer fatalities."
Unfortunately, gun-prohibition lobbies and their congressional
allies have continued to call for such dangerous "experimentation,"
notwithstanding the strong opposition of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms.
Under current proposals, if a bullet can penetrate soft body
armor (which is designed to stop handguns, not rifles), it could be
outlawed. The Kennedy amendment refers to ammunition "designed" to
have "armor-piercing capability." How can one know the inner mind of
someone who designed a bullet, perhaps decades ago?
The Kennedy amendment refers to rifle ammunition that has more
penetrating capability than "standard" ammunition of the same
caliber. In other words, a bureaucrat could decide that "standard"
ammunition in a certain caliber has a certain weight and velocity,
and any round with a greater weight or velocity could be
administratively prohibited.
As the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives urges,
the safest approach is to leave existing laws in place — rather than
frightening the public and endangering the police in order to score
political points. The Fraternal Order of Police agrees, and opposes
the Kennedy amendment.
— David Kopel is the
research director at the Independence
Institute. |